Thus, the writer brightly portrays how American history was shaped relying on the event taken place in Virginia. Here, he shows that the recognition of slavery did not necessarily have to be an inherent part of English colonization. Viewing generally the book, it is hard to omit the fact that Morgan’s study of that paradox is mostly connected with the history of Virginia where he simply describes Virginia colonial experience. To support the idea, the author examines different levels of society and illustrates the inevitable union. According to Morgan’s strong belief, the rise of liberty and freedom and the existence of slavery was “central paradox of American history” from seventeenth to nineteenth century. In addition, Morgan makes a tangible accent of an enormous interest of Virginia’s colonists to gain high profits by means of slaves. In other words, racism was the trigger point that facilitated the official introduction of slavery. Morgan’s argument concerning the existence of slavery is proved by the idea the acknowledgment of racism of Virginia of that time. Later, servitude was officially accepted. Further on, the inhabitants of the Brutish colony did not express a burning desire to change their ways of life and slaves were considered to be a profitable and beneficial property.

Moreover, people were consciously working since they considered it to be their duty to cultivate Virginia’s land. Instead, they compare slavery with an honorable service to the welfare of the upper levels of the society. Consequently, the government refused to acknowledge the fact of suppression of human inherent rights and freedoms. In Morgan’s opinion, Virginia colony could be compared with Utopia place where slavery was considered to be a mere labor work of people that were addicted to “Protestant Ethics” of Max Webber.

Edmund s morgan slavery and freedom